version soumise

This commit is contained in:
ORGERIE Anne-Cecile 2019-07-19 13:21:07 +02:00
parent 13278c78d3
commit de531ec263
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ and transmission technologies.
* Evaluation
#+LaTeX: \label{sec:eval}
In this section, we analyze the experimental results.
** IoT and Network Power Consumption
In this section, we analyze the experimental results.
In a first place, we start by studying the impact of the sensors' transmission frequency on their
energy consumption. To this end, we run several simulations in ns3 with 15 sensors using
different transmission frequencies. The results provided by Table
@ -562,8 +562,8 @@ In our case with small and sporadic network traffic, these results show that wit
belongs to the system's accounted consumption.
2. For the network part, the data packets generated by the IoT
device travel through network switches, routers and ports that
are shared with other trafic.
3. For the cloud part, the VM hosthing the data is shared with
are shared with other traffic.
3. For the cloud part, the VM hosting the data is shared with
other IoT devices belonging to the same application and the
server hosting the VM also hosts other VMs. Furthermore, the
server belongs to a data center and takes part in the overall
@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ In our case with small and sporadic network traffic, these results show that wit
virtual CPUs. We do not
consider here over-commitment of Cloud servers. Yet, the dynamic
energy part is computed with the real dynamic measurements, so it
accounts for VM over-provisionning and resource under-utilization.
accounts for VM over-provisioning and resource under-utilization.
In our case, the Cloud server has 14 cores, which corresponds to
the potential hosting of 14 small VMs with one virtual CPU each,

Binary file not shown.