diff --git a/2019-ICA3PP.org b/2019-ICA3PP.org
index 6f11041..22b55e5 100644
--- a/2019-ICA3PP.org
+++ b/2019-ICA3PP.org
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ and transmission technologies.
      \centering
      \caption{Simulations Energy Parameters}
      \label{tab:wifi-energy}
-     \Subtable[Wifi]{
+     \subtable[IoT part]{
        \begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}}
          Parameter      & Value  \\ \midrule
          Supply Voltage & 3.3V   \\
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ and transmission technologies.
          Idle           & 0.273A \\ \bottomrule
      \end{tabular}}
      \hspace{0.3cm}
-     \subtable[Network]{
+     \subtable[Network part]{
        \label{tab:net-energy}
        \begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}}
          Parameter  & Value \\ \midrule
@@ -589,10 +589,12 @@ In our case with small and sporadic network traffic, these results show that wit
   
    where $P_{static}^{device}$ is the static power consumption of the
    network device (switch fabrics for instance or gateway),
-   $Bandwidth^{application }$ is the bandwidth used by our IoT application,
+   $Bandwidth^{application }$ Is the bandwidth used by our IoT application,
    $AggregateBandwidth^{device }$ is the overall aggregated bandwidth of the
    network device on all its ports, and $LinkUtilization^{device}$ is the
-   effective link utilization percentage. The formula includes the
+   effective link utilization percentage. The $Bandwidth^{application }$
+   depends on the transmission frequency in our use-case.
+   The formula includes the
    link utilization in order to charge for the effective energy cost
    per trafic and not for the theoretical upper bound which is the
    link bandwidth. Indeed, using such an upper bound leads to greatly
@@ -603,7 +605,8 @@ In our case with small and sporadic network traffic, these results show that wit
    our application: the ratio of our bandwidth utilization over the
    port bandwidth multiplied by the link utilization and the overall
    static power consumption of the port. Table \ref{tab:netbidules}
-   summarizes the parameters used in our model.
+   summarizes the parameters used in our model, they are taken from
+   \cite{mahadevan_power_2009}. 
 
    
    #+BEGIN_EXPORT latex
@@ -611,12 +614,12 @@ In our case with small and sporadic network traffic, these results show that wit
      \centering
      \caption{Network Devices Parameters}
      \label{tab:netbidules}
-       \begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}}
-         Parameter      & Value  \\ \midrule
-         Supply Voltage & 3.3V   \\
-         Tx             & 0.38A  \\
-         Rx             & 0.313A \\
-         Idle           & 0.273A \\ \bottomrule
+       \begin{tabular}{l|l}
+         Device      & ~Parameters  \\ \midrule
+         Gateway & ~Static power = 8.3 Watts, Bandwidth = 54Mbps, Utilization = 10\%   \\
+         Core router & ~Static power = 555 Watts, 48 ports of 1 Gbps, Utilization = 25\% \\
+         Edge switch~ & ~Static power = 150 Watts, 48 ports of 1 Gbps, Utilization = 25\% \\
+         \bottomrule
      \end{tabular}}
    \end{table}
    #+END_EXPORT
diff --git a/2019-ICA3PP.pdf b/2019-ICA3PP.pdf
index 95b669d..5c4f451 100644
Binary files a/2019-ICA3PP.pdf and b/2019-ICA3PP.pdf differ